Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation et al v. Thomas & Associates Manufacturing, et al
| 2:2009cv02202 |
| November 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER Approving Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/29/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting Defendants Fiesta Palms LLC and Palms Place LLC's 9 Motion to Dismiss. Fiesta Palms, LLC and Palms Place, LLC terminated. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/12/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
31
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts and Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation against Thomas & Associates Manufacturing. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/1/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation et al v. Thomas & Associates Manufacturing, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
