Glazing Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Queen City Glass Co. et al
| 2:2009cv02301 |
| December 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| Edward C. Reed |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER DENYING 61 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 7/8/2011. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/31/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 5/23/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Rescheduling Settlement Conference. Settlement Conference reset for 5/18/2011 at 01:00 PM in ADR Suite before Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 3/29/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
58
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr, on 2/16/2011. Defendants Motion for Reconsideration 55 , filed on January 28, 2011, requesting reconsideration of our Order 53 , filed on January 19, 2011, is DENIED. The partie s shall have fourteen (14) days within which to file a stipulated scheduling order in light of the amendment of the complaint. If the parties are unable to agree to the new scheduling order, the Court should be advised and a hearing will be set. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
50
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr, on 1/11/2011. Defendants motion for leave to file first amended answer 23 is GRANTED. Defendants shall have 21 days within which to file the first amended answer. Plaintiffs moti on to strike defenses 17 and motion for partial summary judgment on Defendants affirmative defenses 34 are DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and motion in limine 33 is DENIED on the basis that a claim for breach of the subcontractor provision has not been properly pled in the complaint. Defendants motion in limine No. One 36 is GRANTED on the same basis. Plaintiffs motion to dismiss claims against The Guarantee Company of North America 47 is GRANTED. Defend ants motion in limine No. Two 37 is DENIED as moot on the basis that Plaintiffs claims against The Guarantee Company of North America USA shall be dismissed. Plaintiffs may file any motions regarding the amended answer within 56 days after the firs t amended answer is filed. If appropriate, and within 21 days after the date of entry of this order, the parties may move for an amended scheduling order in light of the present status of the case. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Glazing Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Queen City Glass Co. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
