Mitchell v. Skolnik et al
| 2:2009cv02377 |
| December 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Kent J. Dawson |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 69 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/29/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER that the Clerk of Court issue summons to Defendant William Shaw and deliver the summons and a copy of complaint to the US Marshal for service. US Marshal Service shall file a status report regarding status of service no later than 11/25/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER Granting 46 Motion to Compel the Address of DefendantWilliam Shaw. Status Report due by 10/14/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/27/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT all claims against the Defendants in their officialcapacities, claims for damages under RLUIPA, claims brought under NRS § 212.020 and NRS §197.200, claims in Counts III other than those based on retaliation by impeding Plaintiffs worship,and all claims in count IV are dismisse Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 8/11/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER that Plaintiffs 27 Motion to Extend Time is GRANTED, nunc pro tunc. Plaintiffs Motion for Emergency Telephonic Hearing 28 is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion for Order to Show Cause 4 and Motion for Preliminary Injunction 5 are DENIED. Plaint iffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction 29 is DENIED. Defendants first Motion to Dismiss 13 is DENIED as moot, per the filing of Defendants Amended Motion to Dismiss 24 . Defendants shall have up to and including March 21, 2011, to file a reply in response to Plaintiffs Opposition 31 . Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 34 Letter Requesting Copies of a Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/16/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER denying plaintiff's 2 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Clerk to file complaint and add Catherine Cortez Masto as counsel for defendants. Clerk to electronically serve defendants with a copy of this order, the complaint, the motion for a n order to show cause 4 , and the motion for preliminary injunction 5 . Attorney General to advise the court within 20 days whether service of process is accepted. See order for details. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/28/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mitchell v. Skolnik et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
