Ortlieb v. City of Henderson et al
Case Number: 2:2009cv02454
Filed: December 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Lloyd D. George
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order not later than 5/23/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 5/11/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED as to Ortlieb's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment claims and DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 2/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
November 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Granting 14 Notice of Change of Attorney filed by Defendants Kyle Slattery, City of Henderson, Henderson Police Department, and Ron Russo, Attorney Nancy D Savage for City of Henderson. Attorney Nancy D Savage substituted in place of Attorney Ronald Sailon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/12/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ortlieb v. City of Henderson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?