Simmons v. City of Henderson Police Department
Case Number: 2:2010cv00011
Filed: January 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R. Leavitt
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Pro
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Granting 6 & 13 Motions to Dismiss. Denying 10 Motion to Amend, 11 to Serve Notice, 12 To Amend Address, and 17 To Join Parties. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/6/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)
May 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk of Court shall file the complaint, issue summons, and deliver to the U.S. Marshal for service. Plaintiff shall furnish the U.S. Marshal with the required USM-285 for m within 20 days. Proof of service due within 120 days from the date that the complaint was filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED plaintiff shall serve upon defendants a copy of every document submitted for consideration by the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 5/7/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: plaintiff and USM - EDS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simmons v. City of Henderson Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?