Leahy et al v. Lone Mountain Aviation, Inc.
| Hannah Joy Leahy, Rebecca Susan Leahy, Susie Leahy and William John Leahy, III |
| Lone Mountain Aviation, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv00082 |
| January 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Airplane Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER Denying 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , and 73 Motions in Limine. Granting as unopposed 74 , 75 , 76 , and 78 Motions in Limine. Granting 77 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/29/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Denying 51 Motion in Limine and 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a Joint Pretrial Order within 30 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/25/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Granting 49 Motion to Extend Time to File Dispositive Motions. Motions due by 2/6/2012. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/24/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Granting 40 Unopposed Motion Regarding Recovery of Fire Damaged Engine and Frame Log Books. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/19/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
