Alan Stanton Corp v. City of North Las Vegas Housing Authority
2:2010cv00147 |
February 2, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Peggy A. Leen |
Edward C. Reed |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER for Destruction of Exhibits. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/27/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EW, destroyed) |
Filing 25 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr, on 5/11/2010. By Deputy Clerk: Colleen Larsen. Denying 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The arguments made in the motion and evidence submitted in support of it will, howev er, be treated as Defendants opening brief, filed according to the stipulated briefing schedule. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any objections to evidence submitted as part of the stipulated briefing schedule or otherwise already in the record shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of the present Minute Order. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Alan Stanton Corp v. City of North Las Vegas Housing Authority | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.