Hain v. Williams et al
| 2:2010cv00153 |
| February 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| James C. Mahan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER Granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/10/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 24 Motion to Extend Time. Defendants' answer due 4/4/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/15/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER for the Filing of a Notice of Acceptance/Non-Acceptance of Service within 20 days. Answer due 30 days after filing of Notice of Acceptance/Non-Acceptance of Service. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/29/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Denying 16 Motion for Relief from Judgment for Clerical Mistakes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 9/20/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hain v. Williams et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
