Walls v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al
| 2:2010cv00291 |
| March 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for Costs 44 is DENIED. This lawsuit is hereby REMANDED to state court. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/20/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, cc: certified order & docket to 8th Judicial District)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER re 27 Proposed Order Submission filed by BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP, Recontrust Company, N.A. that the foreclosure is prohibited for 90 days following 5/24/10. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/31/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying 18 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 7 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and STAYED while the parties engage in mediation. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/24/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Walls v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
