Woori America Bank v. Sahara Westwood Hotel, LLC et al
Woori America Bank |
Pravin L Patel and Sahara Westwood Hotel, LLC |
2:2010cv00358 |
March 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Kent J. Dawson |
Peggy A. Leen |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER Granting 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Plaintiff and against Defendants in the amount of $1,471,196.74. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 30 ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED in part as to the order to obtain counsel. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 4/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 22 ORDER Granting 21 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Michael D Stein withdrawn from the case as to Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall designate counsel of record no later than 12/13/10. Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on Plaintiff at: Bryan Kim Assistant Regional Manager, Woori America Bank, Calfornia Business Promotion Center, 2610 W. Olympic Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90006. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/24/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.