Coach Services, Inc. v. Rolands Boulevard, Inc. et al
| Coach Services, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv00430 |
| March 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER Granting 28 Motion for Judgment Debtor Exam. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/26/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 25 Motion for Judgment Debtor Exam. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 10/3/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Granting 16 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/14/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coach Services, Inc. v. Rolands Boulevard, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Coach Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lori E Siderman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
