Ambac Assurance Corporation et al v. Las Vegas Monorail Company
| Ambac Assurance Corporation and Segregated Account of Ambac Assurance Corporation |
| Las Vegas Monorail Company |
| US Trustee |
| 2:2010cv00678 |
| May 11, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| James C. Mahan |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER denying Ambac Assurance Corporation's 63 Motion for Rehearing of the Order dated January 31, 2011. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER Denying as moot 26 Emergency Request for Certification for Direct Appeal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 25 Motion to Expedite is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/31/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER that Ambac Assurance Corporation et als motion to treat May 10, 2010 notice of appeal as a notice of appeal as of right under the collateral order doctrine 15 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Ambac Assurance Corporation et als emergency motion for stay pending appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8005 27 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/29/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
