Serino v. Florisi et al
Angele Florisi and Robert J. Florisi |
Nicholas Serino |
U.S. Trustee |
2:2010cv00810 |
May 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
James C. Mahan |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDERED that appellees Angele Florisi and Robert Florisi's Motion for attorney's fees in the amount of $1,876.67 (doc. #16) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/8/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 15 ORDER DISMISSING 1 Notice of Appeal. Bankruptcy Court's April 13, 2010 Order is Affirmed. Appellees Angele Florisi and Robert Florisi's request for costs and attorney's fees be, and the same hereby is, Denied without Prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/20/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: Bankruptcy Court - ASB) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying 3 Motion to Recuse. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/20/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 5 ORDER Granting 4 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Laurel E. Davis withdrawn from the case as to Mr. Serino. Mr. Serino is provided with an additional 30 days to prepare and file his opening brief as well as his reply brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 7/12/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.