Righthaven LLC v. EMTCity.com et al
Righthaven LLC |
EMTCity.com and Christopher J. Malley |
2:2010cv00854 |
June 4, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Howard D. McKibben |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER Granting 40 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney by Anne Pieroni as counsel of record for Righthaven. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 4/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 37 ORDER that Defendant EMTCity.com shall file its Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 4:00 p.m., April 18, 2011. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/4/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 28 ORDER Denying 22 Renewed Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 1/24/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 19 ORDER that Defendants Motion to Stay Rule 26(f) Conference 12 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The parties shall conduct a Rule 26(f) conference for the purpose of discussing and scheduling the limited discovery directed by the district judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/26/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.