Rapaport v. Soffer
| Ezriel Rapaport |
| Avi E. Soffer |
| 2:2010cv00935 |
| June 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 135 Stipulation to Dismiss with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/13/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER Granting 131 Motion for Clarification. The portion of the Courtss Order re: Defendant Soffer's Objection to Magistrate's Sanctions Orders and Report and Recommendation 129 that obligates Soffer to pay $14,992.41 in sanct ions by January 9, 2014, and Rosenfeld (personally) to pay $29,395.18 in sanctions by January 9, 2014, is stayed pending the outcome of the bankruptcy cases or further order of the bankruptcy courts. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/18/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER Denying 125 Defendant's Motion for Oral Argument. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT 102 Soffer's Objection to the Magistrate's Orders and Report and Recommendation are SUSTAINED in part. The Court declines to adopt the 97 Report and Recommendation to strike Soffers answer and dismiss his claims; instead, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Soffer serve any and all outstanding discovery responses within 45 days of this order. Rapaport shall serve Rosenfeld and the law firm of Rosenfeld and Bauman with a copy of this order no later than 5 days. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/09/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER Granting 112 Plaintiff's Motion to Reinstate Motions. The stay of this proceeding is now lifted. Responses to 102 Soffer's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation are due within 14 days from the entry of this Order. The parties are to file a Joint Status Report report within 14 days from the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/17/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER Granting 110 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Plaintiff shall have until 7/11/2013 in which to retain new counsel who shall file a notice of appearance. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this Order to Avi Soffer at the address listed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/11/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Avi Soffer - SLD)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER that this consolidated case is stayed pending resolution of Defendant/Counterclaimants bankruptcy or until the automatic stay is lifted. All pending motions (Case No. 2:10-cv-00935-MMD-NJK, dkt. no. 97; Case No. 2:12-cv-00057-MMD-NJK, dkt. nos . 8, 12, 13, 23) in the consolidated cases are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. When the stay is lifted, any party may move to reinstate the previously pending motions. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/1/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER that sanctions and costs due and payable to the Plaintiff in the amount of $29,395.18. This amount shall be paid jointly and severally, by Defendant Soffer, his counsel Efrem Rosenfeld and the law firm of Rosenfeld & Bauman on or before January 31, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 12/31/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER that 40 the Trust's Motion to Strike Amended Answer is DENIED and Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. FURTHER ORDERED that 41 Motion to Seal is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/29/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Granting 51 Motion to Dismiss to Dismiss or Strike Third Party Complaint. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER Denying 45 Notice of Change of Attorney filed by Avi E. Soffer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 10/13/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Denying 8 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 5/12/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Granting 11 Motion to Set Aside 7 Clerk's Entry of Default. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 1/3/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rapaport v. Soffer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ezriel Rapaport | |
| Represented By: | Kyle O Stephens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Avi E. Soffer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
