Hannon et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
| Lawrence Hannon and Luz Hannon |
| Trustee Corps. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage |
| 2:2010cv00966 |
| June 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Kent J. Dawson |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER Granting 45 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting 47 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and Denying 60 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 06/26/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Denying 56 Motion to Strike, Granting 65 Motion to Extend Time to File Dispositive Motions, Denying as Moot 23 Motion to Dismiss, and Denying as Moot 26 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 2/7/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
52
PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding Confidentiality of Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/27/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Denying 4 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint is Granted. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/21/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
