Sandoval et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Jordhy Leal, Martha Leal, David Madueno, Monica Moreno, Kenya Rodriguez, Adriana Rodriguez, Henry Brian Rodriguez and Jesus Rodriguez Sandoval |
County Of Clark and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department |
2:2010cv01196 |
July 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 ORDER that Defendant's Motion in Limine ECF No. 69 and Plaintiff's Motion in Limine ECF No. 70 are granting in part and denying in part. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 01/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Filing 47 ORDER Granting 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/24/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 40 ORDER the trial date in this matter is set for May 22, 2012, at 8:30 a.m., with calendar call on May 7, 2012, at 8:30 a.m., before Judge Robert C. Jones. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/20/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 4 ORDER that Plaintiffs shall file their Certificate of Interested Parties by 9/24/2010. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/10/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.