Colombo v. Bank of America Corporation, N.A. et al
| Christina G Colombo |
| BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Bank of America Corporation, N.A., Bank of America Home Loans and Recontrust Company |
| 2:2010cv01206 |
| July 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER Magistrate Judge Leens Report of Findings and Recommendation 17 is Affirmed and Plaintiff Christina G. Colombos Complaint 1 is DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute 18 is DENIED as moot. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 20 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/1/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Michael R. Mushkin withdrawn from the case. Plaintiff shall advise court by 1/3/11 whether she will be proceeding Pro se or has retained new counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/16/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, cc: Christina Colombo)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER that the parties shall file a Joint Status Report by 9/24/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/10/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
