Minshew v. Donley et al
| Mary Maureen Minshew |
| Alpha-Omega Change Engineering, Kurt Bergo, Michael B. Donley, George Salton and Secretary of the Air Force |
| 2:2010cv01593 |
| September 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
197
ORDER Granting 196 Joint Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear their respective attorneys fees and costs. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 01/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER that the parties shall submit their stipulation to dismiss no later than December 20, 2013, or alternatively a Joint Status Report advising when settlement proceeds will be delivered and the stipulation filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/13/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER that 176 Motion to Submit Exhibits Under Seal is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 180 Motion to File Under Seal is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall unseal Docket Nos. 114, 118-21, 130-31, 136, 138-41, 144, 146-47, 151, 154, and 159-64. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file redacted versions of Docket Nos. 115, 148, and 149, including all exhibits, consistent with the above rulings on or before April 5, 2013. The redacted filings will not be filed under seal. F URTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file redacted versions of Docket Nos. 142 and 155, including all exhibits, consistent with the above rulings on or before April 5, 2013. The redacted filings will not be filed under seal. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/19/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER that 114 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 118 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby granted in favor of Defendant Alpha-Omega Change Engineering and against Plaintiff Mary Maur een Minshew. FURTHER ORDERED that 138 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Kurt Bergo and George Salton and against Plaintiff Mary Maureen Minshew. FURTHER ORDERED that 140 Motion for S ummary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is granted to the extent that the Court hereby dismisses count four of Plaintiff Mary Maureen Minshews Amended Complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The Motion is denied in all other res pects. FURTHER ORDERED that the following motions are GRANTED: 137 Motion to File Under Seal Summary Judgment Briefs; 143 Motion to File Reply Under Seal; 145 Motion to Submit Reply Under Seal; 150 Motion to Submit Combined Reply Unde r Seal; 152 Motion to Submit Erratum Under Seal; 153 Motion to File Under Seal Reply Memorandum. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall show cause, in writing no later than January 18, 2013, why each of the sealed filings at Docket Nos. 1 14-15, 118-21, 130-31, 136, 138-42, 144, 146-49, 151, 154-55, and 159-64 should not be unsealed. If the parties fail to show cause, the sealed filings at Docket Nos. 114-15, 118-21, 130-31, 136, 138-42, 144, 146-49, 151, 154-55, and 159-64 will be un sealed. A party seeking to seal only portions of a document shall provide a proposed redacted copy of the document.FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining parties shall file a proposed joint pretrial order on or before December 21, 2012. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/3/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER that Defendant Alpha Omega Change Engineering, Inc's request to substitute Brian L. Bradford in place and stead of Carleton R. Burch 156 is GRANTED, subject to the provisions of LR IA 10-6(c) and (d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/24/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER Granting 117 Motion to Seal 118 MOTION for Summary Judgment and respective Declarations and Exhibits. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/15/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER Granting 111 Motion to Extend Time to File Dispositive Motions. Dispositive Motions due by 3/30/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/2/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER Granting 106 Motion to Seal 104 Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER Denying as moot 77 MOTION to Stay. Motion Hearing set for 7/19/2011 09:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/28/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
66
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER Granting in Part 61 Proposed Consent Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Denying 46 Motion to Dismiss Bivens Claim. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER Granting 47 Request to Excuse Colonel Jurt Bergo from Attending ENE scheduled for 1/28/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/24/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
