Jordan v. Williams et al
| Leshon Jordan |
| Bannister, Mr. Skolnik, Utilization Committee and Mr. Williams |
| 2:2010cv01595 |
| September 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without Prejudice. Clerk of Court shall enter judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/1/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the Finance Division of the Clerk's Office and to the attention of the Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Corrections. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 2 Motion for Status Check is GRANTED. Clerk shall file complaint. Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days of entry of this order. Amended complaint shall be titled as directed in this order . Clerk shall provide a copy of the complaint with 2 copies of a 1983 complaint form and one copy of instructions. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/5/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USDC Finance; Chief Inmate Services; Plaintiff -EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
