Carter et al v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC
Kevin Carter and Daniel Gerstel |
Wynn Las Vegas, LLC |
2:2010cv01868 |
October 25, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Kent J. Dawson |
Robert J. Johnston |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER that the parties have selected to have their rights determined by an arbitrator and there is no case or controversy left for the Court to adjudicate. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs Complaint as moot, without prejudice. All other outstanding motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 7/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 47 ORDER Granting 34 Motion to Dismiss. Amended Complaint deadline: 7/28/2011. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 7/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 41 ORDER for the Filing of a Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by 4/29/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/19/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 27 ORDER that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by 2/24/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.