Collins v. Williams et al
| Marlon D Collins |
| Cheryl Burson, CCS Hill, III, Jerry Howell, Vincent Rabourn and Brian E. Williams, Sr. |
| 2:2010cv01967 |
| November 9, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Kent J. Dawson |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER Denying 18 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Declaration; Denying 20 Plaintiff's Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order; Denying 30 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting 37 Defendants' Motion f or Summary Judgment; Granting 42 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time; and Granting 43 Defendants' Motion to Extend time. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 08/08/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
Filing
51
ORDER Denying without prejudice 49 Plaintiff's Motion for Free Copies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/13/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Filing
28
ORDERED that 24 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. SCHEDULING ORDER. See Order for details . Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/20/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Filing
19
ORDER Granting 11 Motion for Partial Dismissal. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/16/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.