Holcomb v. Scillia et al
| Dale Eugene Holcomb |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Anthony M. Scillia |
| 2:2010cv02015 |
| November 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER that 11 Petitioner's Motion for Enlargement of Time is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 9 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/31/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Denying 2 Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 3 Petitioner's Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically s erve upon Respondents a copy of the petition and return a copy to petitioner. Respondents shall answer or respond within 45 days of service of petition. Petitioner shall reply within 45 days of answer. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/19/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: petitioner - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
