Glover et al v. Gillespie
Shawn Lynn Glover |
Doug Gillespie |
Chief Deputy DA Steven S. Owens |
2:2011cv00011 |
January 5, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Robert J. Johnston |
James C. Mahan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The clerk of court shall enter judgment. Petitioner's request for status conference 14 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 12 ORDER Granting 11 Motion to File a Reply re 10 Answer to Habeas Petition, filed by Steven S. Owens. Petitioner shall have through 4/22/11 to file a reply to respondent's answer. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 4 ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by having the U.S. Marshal make personal service upon Sheriff Douglas C. Gillespie. Respondent shall have 3 days within which to answer and show cause why rel ief should not be granted. The motion for appointment of counsel 3 is GRANTED. The federal public defender is appointed to represent petitioner. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/4/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, cc: USM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.