M&I Bank, FSB v Paradise Investors Group LLC et al
M&I Bank, FSB |
Gregory Stanford Family Trust and Paradise Investors Group LLC |
Audrey D Stanford and Gregory D Stanford |
M&I Bank, FSB |
Paradise Investors Group LLC |
2:2011cv00021 |
January 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Lawrence R. Leavitt |
James C. Mahan |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice re: 34 Stipulation for Dismissal. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/5/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 32 ORDER that the currently pending motion to strike jury demand 15 and the currently pending motion for partial summary judgment 16 are DENIED as moot. The hearing currently set for February 2, 2012 is VACATED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 24 Stipulated ORDER that the time to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses and reports as set forth at section IX of the Joint Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order in this matter is hereby extended pursuant to the parties' stipulation above from October l9, 2011 to November 3, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 9/22/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.