Case name not on file
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
Richard M Almeida |
Richard M Almeida |
2:2011cv00061 |
January 11, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Lawrence R. Leavitt |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER that 29 Petitioner Richard Almeida's Second Amended Motion to Amend Naturalization Certificate to Reflect Correct Birthdate is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 34 Respondents' Cross-motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/13/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting 13 Motion for Leave to Appear. Attorney Troy Liggett added for United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 10/7/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 2 ORDER that Petitioner must mail the three individuals listed above his Motion to Amend Certificate of Naturalization 1 and this Order, and must file proof of that service within thirty (30) days of the date on which this Order is entered. A hearing on Petitioners Motion will take place on 4/14/11 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 7D at the Lloyd D. George Federal Courthouse in Las Vegas, Nevada. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/23/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.