Securities and Exchange Commission v. Maloney
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Theodore Robert Maloney
Case Number: 2:2011cv00075
Filed: January 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Roger L. Hunt
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Johnston
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 95 FINAL JUDGMENT as to Defendant Theodore R. Maloney in the amount of $100,000.00. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
November 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER Granting 89 Plaintiff's Motion to Convene a Status Conference. Status Hearing set for 12/5/2013 10:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Mr. Duane K. Thompson may appear telephonically and Defendant Maloney must appear in person. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/6/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
March 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER referring case to U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston for a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 3/19/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
December 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER Granting 28 and 33 Motions to Withdraw as Attorney by Brent R. Baker and Abran E. Vigil. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall transfer file to defendant Theodore Maloney forthwith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Status Conference is se t for 1/5/2012 11:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston. Defendant Theodore R. Maloney is required to be present for this hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendant Maloney by certified mail, return receipt requested, at address included on 28 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 12/8/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - certified mail #70090960000041007528 - EDS)
May 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER that the parties shall file joint Interim Discovery Status Reports on 7/5/11, 8/29/11, and 10/24/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 5/19/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
January 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting 2 Motion to Permit Appearance of Government Attorneys Duane K. Thompson and Marie K.N. DeBonis. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 1/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Maloney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Theodore Robert Maloney
Represented By: Brent R. Baker
Represented By: Abran E. Vigil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Marie K. N. DeBonis
Represented By: Duane K Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?