Yanke v. Chase Home Finance Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Rodney J Yanke
Defendant: Chase Home Finance Inc. and California Reconveyance Co.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00126
Filed: January 24, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Johnston
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Pro
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER that Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint 27 is GRANTED and that Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/26/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
September 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING Motion to Extend Deadline. Responses due by 10/12/2011 re 27 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/12/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
July 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for Injunction Prohibiting Negative Credit Reporting by Defendants 16 is DENIED. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint 9 is GRANTED, provided that Plaintiff shall have to and including August 18, 2011, within which to file an Amended Complaint to state a claim for insurance fraud if he can do so. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/19/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
April 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER that Defendants Motion to Stay Litigation and Discovery Proceedings Pending Disposition of Motion to Dismiss 18 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
March 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion to Allow Plaintiff to File Electronically 12 will be granted upon the filing of a Notice of Compliance by Plaintiff Rodney J. Yanke that he has completed the CM/ECF Tutorial and is familiar with Electronic Filing Proce dures, Best Practices, and Civil and Criminal Events Menu that are accessible on this Courts website. Such certification must be filed by April 25, 2011 or the request will be denied. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yanke v. Chase Home Finance Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney J Yanke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chase Home Finance Inc.
Represented By: Jordan J Butler
Represented By: Jay E Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Reconveyance Co.
Represented By: Jordan J Butler
Represented By: Jay E Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?