Brown-Younger v. State Of Nevada et al
| Kirsha Brown-Younger |
| Dept of Human Services, Dept of Welfare Services and State Of Nevada |
| 2:2011cv00505 |
| April 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Civil Rights: Welfare |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER AFFIRMING 27 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions 6 and 8 are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/15/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Denying without prejudice 16 Motion to Compel; 17 Motion for Service of Process of Complaint and Summons; 19 Motion to Compel; 20 Motion for Sanctions re Discovery; and 29 Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File Electronically. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk shall file the complaint; The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Amended Complaint deadline: 7/7/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 6/7/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
