Adamson v. Amati et al
Plaintiff: Gregory K. Adamson
Defendant: Amati, Bennell, Burke, City of Las Vegas, Nevada, Karen M. Coyne, Michelle Granados, Stephanie B. Kice, Las Vegas Nevada Municipal Jail, Roy and Brian Smith
Case Number: 2:2011cv00781
Filed: May 13, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying Plaintiff's ECF No. 87 Rule 60(b) Motion. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
March 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with 64 Order; directing Clerk to close case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
March 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER that the following motions are denied: motion to reconsider (dkt. no. 67 ); motion to extend time (dkt. no. 68 ); renewed motion for recusal (dkt. no. 69 ); renewed motion for change of judge (dkt. no. 70 ); renewed motion for appointment of counsel (dkt. no. 71 ); motion to extend time (dkt. no. 74 ); motion for additions to motion (dkt. no. 75 ). Any future motions raising similar issues that the Court has considered will be summarily denied. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/2/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the following motions filed by Plaintiff are denied: (1) Motion for Competency Evaluation 54 ; (2) Motion to Stay Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 55 ; (3) Motion for Rule 17(c) Protection 56 ; (4) Motion for Court A ppointed Counsel 57 ; (5) Motion for Change of Judge 58 ; and (6) Motion for Extension 60 .IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Brian Smith's Motion to Dismiss 36 is Granted. Claims against Smith are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to issue judgment accordingly.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss 38 is Denied. Plaintiff will be given up to and including 2/12/16, to file Amended Proof of Service on the following City Defendants : Detention Officer Amati, Detention Officer Sergeant Bennell, Booking Detention Officer Burke, Department of Detention and Enforcement Chief Karen M. Coyne and Detention Classification Officer Roy. This deadline will not be extended. Failure to file amended proof of service within this deadline will result in dismissal of claims against these City Defendants. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/14/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
July 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER that the following motions are denied: 45 Motion for Stay of Proceedings Indefinitely; 46 Motion that the City Defendant make Funds Available to Plaintiff; 47 Motion for Subpoena of Video and Related records; 48 Motion Scheduling Settlement Conference; and 49 Motion for Determination of Plaintiff's Competency. It is further ordered that Plaintiff has up to and including August 28, 2015 to respond to the two pending motions to dismiss (dkt. nos. 36 , 38 ). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/28/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER that 16 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. The Court extends the deadline for Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $350.00 for an additional 30 days. Failure to pay the filing fee within 30 days will result in dismissal of the Complaint. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/11/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) (Main Document 17 replaced on 6/12/2014) (MMM).
May 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting 4 Motion for Magistrate Judge to Reconsider Magistrate Judge Order. Fully Completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis or Payment of filing fees due 6/8/2012. IFP Form and Instructions mailed to Plaintiff. The clerk shall retain Plaintiff's complaint, but shall not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/2/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adamson v. Amati et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory K. Adamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bennell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Las Vegas, Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen M. Coyne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle Granados
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephanie B. Kice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Las Vegas Nevada Municipal Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?