Webster v. Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.
Plaintiff: Carolyn Webster
Defendant: Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00784
Filed: May 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Johnston
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER Denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Sanctions re Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/3/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
March 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER Granting Defendant Beazer's 61 Motion for Leave to File a Reply. Beazer shall file a brief reply to its 54 Motion in Limine of not more than 10 pages within 7 days of entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER that this case is currently scheduled for bench trial on the stacked calendar of 4/1/2014 and is referred to The Honorable Cam Ferenbach for the purpose of conducting a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/27/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
January 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER Denying 31 Motion to Dismiss. Denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment. Denying 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. Denying 36 , 38 , 37 , 40 Countermotions for Attorneys Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/23/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
December 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER Granting 5 Motion to Dismiss. The complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff shal have 30 days in which to file an amended complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that 13 CounterMotion for Attorney's Fees and Costs is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/30/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
July 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDERED that defendants' brief concerning removal 15 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that Defendant is granted 20 days to establish the minimum amount in controversy for federal jurisdiction. Plaintiff is granted 10 days to file an opposition. No reply is required. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Webster v. Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.
Represented By: Megan K Dorsey
Represented By: Andrew C. Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Webster
Represented By: Brandon W McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?