Bell v. Sheriff, CCDC et al
| William Mitchell Bell |
| Clark County Detention Center, MD Keith Courtney, Dr. Essex, P. Gray, E. Hernandez, Dr. Hunter, Naphcare, Inc., L. Paradiso, M. Prevorst, Sheriff, CCDC, J. H. Springgate and Dr. Weisner |
| 2:2011cv00922 |
| June 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Lloyd D. George |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Keith Courtney AND against William Mitchell Bell in the amount of $4,875.00. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 12/16/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER Granting 5 Motion to Dismiss as to Defendant Keith Courtney and Denying as Moot 18 Motion to Extend Time. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 10/20/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 13 Motion to Stay Discovery and Granting 17 Motion to Extend Time to Serve Summons and Complaint. Proof of service due by 1/28/2012. Clerk shall issue summons for Naphcare, Inc. Copy of Order, Complaint and Summons to USM. Copy of Order, USM-285 form, and summons to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/27/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
