Nance v. First Horizon Home Loans et al
Rebecca J. Nance |
UTLS Default Services, LLC and First Horizon Home Loans |
2:2011cv00938 |
June 9, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Peggy A. Leen |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER Granting 27 Motion to Strike Or, in the Alternative, Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Response & Opposition. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/19/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 25 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 10 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims for relief 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend her Complaint and shall file the amended complaint not later than March 15, 2012. Failure to file an amended complaint by that date will result in dismissal of this lawsuit. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/21/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 24 ORDER Granting 20 Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling on 10 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.