Suratos v. Myles et al
Milagros Rayray Suratos |
Carolyn Myles and Attorney General |
2:2011cv00955 |
June 10, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Kent J. Dawson |
George Foley |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER Denying 16 Motion for Certificate of Appealability re 14 Notice of Appeal. E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/29/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 12 ORDER Granting 7 Motion to Dismiss Petition. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/12/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 4 ORDER that Clerk file and electronically serve petition upon respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 45 days from the date of entry of this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond, to the petition. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/22/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 2 ORDER that the Clerk shall send petitioner a set of forms for a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the entry of this order to pay required filing fee, or submit a completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/13/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: petitioner - EDS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.