Schmidt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
| David Schmidt |
| C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc. |
| 2:2011cv00978 |
| June 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
ORDER that 120 Response to Motion shall remain under seal. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff David Schmidt shall re-file his entire Opposition to Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc.'s and Davol, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment, including all exhi bits, with appropriate redactions, for the public record in accordance with Special Order No. 108 on or before October 31, 2013. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall unseal 116 Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc.s and Davol, Inc.'s Motion to Bifurcate Trial in its entirety. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/4/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER that 150 & 151 Motion to Reconsider Court's Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/16/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
154
ORDER that 147 Motion to Seal 150 MOTION for Reconsideration is DENIED without prejudice for the parties to file any motions and supporting affidavits they deem necessary in light of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall show cau se, in writing no later than September 20, 2013, why Plaintiff David Schmidt's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc.'s and Davol, Inc.'s Motion to Bifurcate Trial 116 and Plaintiff David Schmidt's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc.'s and Davol, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 120 and accompanying exhibits should not be unsealed. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/20/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER that 109 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 100 Motion to Bifurcate Trial is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/22/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER Granting 119 Motion to Seal 120 Response to Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/16/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER Granting 115 Motion to Seal Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate Trial. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/30/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER Granting 96 Motion to Seal. All of the exhibits to the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate Trial shall be filed under seal. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/12/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER Granting 67 Motion to Extend Deadlines. Motions due by 7/6/2012. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/6/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/18/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER Denying 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/5/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER Granting 55 Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/27/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER Granting 52 Motion to Seal. All of the exhibits to Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed under seal. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/17/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDERED that the provisions of Paragraph 16 of the parties' Proposed Stipulated Protective Order 31 that requires them to file confidential material with the Clerk of Court in a sealed envelope is NOT APPROVED and is DENIED. The parties shall comply with the requirements of LR 10-5(b), and the Ninth Circuit's decision in Kamakana, 447F.3d 1172, with respect to any documents filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Granting 32 Motion to Seal. All of the exhibits to the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative Partial Summary Judgment, shall be filed under seal. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/27/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
