Toy et al v. State Of Nevada et al
| Doris Cecelia Toy and Joseph T. Toy |
| Atlantic County, Camden County, Clark County, Medwest Ambulance Company, Nevada District Court, North Las Vegas Police Department, North Vista Hospital, Owner and Employees of the same, Pair of Dice Trailer Park, Southern Nevada Mental Health Services, State Of Nevada, State Of New Jersey and Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center |
| 2:2011cv00984 |
| June 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER Affirming 3 Report of Findings and Recommendation and the Complaint as to Co-Plaintiff Doris Toy is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/11/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDERED that Plaintiff Doris Cecelia Toy shall file a separate Application to Proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by a signed financial certificate. Alternatively, Plaintiffs shall make the necessary arrangements to pay the filing fee of & #036;350, accompanied by a copy of this Order. Plaintiffs shall have 30 days from the date of which this order is entered to comply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/22/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; blank ifp form to plaintiff - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
