Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Berry et al
| Fireman's Fund Insurance Company |
| John Berry and Kathleen Sebelius |
| Fireman's Fund Insurance Company |
| John Berry |
| 2:2011cv01029 |
| June 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Lloyd D. George |
| George Foley |
| Contract: Recovery Medicare |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER Granting 26 Stipulation and Order for Disbursement of Funds, Dismissal of Counter-Claim and Closure of Case. Clerk of Court shall disburse funds on deposit in the Court's Registry including all interest on those funds as follows: Unite d States Department of Justice on behalf of Kathleen Sebelius, the sum of $15,456.40. To John Berry and Ganz and Hauf, the sum of $461,408.79 plus interest. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Fireman's Fun Insurance Company is disch arged from further liability to John Berry and Kathleen Sebelius in the 8th Judicial Court case. Clerk is directed to close this matter. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/29/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USDC Finance - EDS)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Granting 5 Ex Parte Motion to Deposit Funds into Court Registry. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 7/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
