Garity v. APWU-AFl-CIO et al
Rosemary Garity |
APWU Local #7156 and APWU-AFl-CIO |
2:2011cv01109 |
July 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Philip M. Pro |
George Foley |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 209 ORDER that Defendant APWU National Labor Organization's 182 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The clerk of court shall enter judgment in favor of APWU National Labor Organization and against Rosemary Garity. Plaintiff's 188 Motion to Strike is Denied and APWU's 204 Motion to Strike is Denied. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 201 ORDER that Magistrate Judge Hoffman's decision is Affirmed in its entirety and the Plaintiff's 187 Objection is Denied. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/8/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 200 ORDER Granting 199 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 182 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Defendant's Reply due by 9/21/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 195 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Defendant APWU-AFI-CIO's 149 Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony. Dr. Gregory Brown is not excluded. Proposed expert Patricia Barnes is excluded. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/15/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 145 ORDER that Rosemary Garity is removed from the Pilot Pro Bono program. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/7/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Mai Tieu - SLD) |
Filing 143 ORDER Referring Case to the Pro Bono Program. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall also forward this order to the Pro Bono Liaison. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is STAYED for a period of 30 days to allow the Pro Bono Program to attempt to locate counsel for plaintiff Rosemary Garity. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/24/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: pro bono liaison - TR) |
Filing 126 ORDER Granting 91 and 95 Motions to Dismiss. The Clerk of Court shall forthwith enter judgment in favor of Defendant APWU-AFL-CIO and against Plaintiff Rosemary Garity. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/14/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 124 ORDER Granting 116 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/21/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 123 ORDER Granting 121 Motion to Reschedule Hearing. Motion Hearing set for 1/8/2013 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 7C before Judge Philip M. Pro re 91 and 95 MOTIONS to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/18/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 115 ORDER Denying 114 Motion for Magistrate Judge to Reconsider Magistrate Judge Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/28/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 110 ORDER Denying 100 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/14/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 102 ORDER Denying without prejudice 89 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/24/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 86 ORDER Granting 85 Motion to Drop Defendant Local #7156 from this Action and to Allow Withdrawal of Counsel. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/31/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 76 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 57 and 60 Motions to Dismiss Amended Complaint. The Motions are GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claims of hostile work environment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1985and § 1986. The Motions are DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 6/18/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 53 ORDER that Defendant APWU-AFL-CIOs Motion to Dismiss 11 is GRANTED and that Plaintiffs Complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as to said Defendant. Defendant APWU Local #7156's Motion to Dismiss 15 is GRANTED without prejudice. P laintiff Rosemary Garity shall have an additional 30 days, to and including November 28, 2011, within which to file a Proposed Amended Complaint and thereafter to effect proper service on Defendants. Failure to do so will result in a conversion of this Order from dismissal without prejudice to dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/27/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 31 ORDER Granting 29 Motion for Leave to Appear for Attorney Anton G. Hajjar for APWU Local #7156. Richard McCracken Designated as Local Counsel. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/18/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 30 ORDER Denying 21 Motion for Default Judgment and Granting 25 Motion to File its Motion to Dismiss One Day Out of Time. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/16/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting 4 Motion to Extend Deadline. APWU Local #7156 and APWU-AFl-CIO answer due 8/8/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 7/22/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.