Clark County Prosecutors Association v. Clark County Board Of Commissioners et al
| Clark County Prosecutors Association |
| Steve Sisolak, Lawrence Weekly, Susan Brager, Larry Brown, Clark County Board Of Commissioners, Clark County, State of Nevada, Tom Collins, Chris Giunchigliani and Mary Beth Scow |
| 2:2011cv01111 |
| July 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| James C. Mahan |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER Granting 55 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the pleadings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/30/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER Denying 48 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/15/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER Denying 40 Motion for Leave to Appear as Amicus Counsel and File an Amicus Curiae Brief as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 07/26/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Denying 28 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/9/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
