Sedano et al v. State Of Nevada et al
| Lidia E Sedano and Hiram Sedano |
| Brian Snyder, State Of Nevada, Catherine Cortez Masto and Kimberly O'Kezie |
| 2:2011cv01144 |
| July 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| James C. Mahan |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER Granting 9 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; and Granting 13 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; and Denying 12 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. Clerk shall correct the docket to reflect that plainti ff's counter motion for default judgment 17 is plaintiff's reply to documents 14 and 16. Clerk shall correct the docket to reflect that plaintiff's counter motion to dismiss 18 is plaintiff's opposition to document 9 and document 21 is defendant's reply thereto. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a supplement to his Certificate of Interested Parties 8 to indicate why he believes US Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen has an interest in the outcome of this litigation on or before 8/23/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
