Wasiak v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation et al
Andrew Wasiak |
Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, PNC Bank Mortgage and U.S. Bank N.A. |
2:2011cv01190 |
July 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Peggy A. Leen |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER Withdrawing 35 Defendant PNC's Motion for Attorney Fees. In the event the parties are unable to complete the settlement, Defendant PNC need onlyfile a notice requesting its Motion for Attorney Fees be put back on for decision. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/5/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 43 ORDER Granting 41 Motion to Allow Filing of Sur-Reply. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/18/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 40 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 39 Motion to Stay Pending Appeal. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/7/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 30 ORDER that Defendant PNC Bank Mortgages Motion to Dismiss 7 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Case terminated. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/29/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.