Collins v. Evertt et al
David L. Collins |
Warden V. Evertt and Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
2:2011cv01435 |
September 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Carl W. Hoffman |
James C. Mahan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER Denying 2 Petitioner's Motion for Discharge of Debt. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 8 Petitioner's Motion to Show Cause is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY is DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that clerk of court shall file petition for a writ of habeas corpus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of entr y of this order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall add Catherine Cortez Masto as counsel for respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically serve upon respondents a copy of the petition and this order. No response is necessary. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/11/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.