Miller v. Henry et al
| Craig M. Miller |
| Hatched Development, Inc. and Brian Henry |
| 2:2011cv01724 |
| October 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER that Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Brian Henry and Hatched Development, Inc. and against Plaintiff Craig Miller in the amount of $55,129.90 in attorneys fees. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 38 Motion for Attorney Fees. Affidavit due by 10/14/2013. Responses due by 10/23/2013. Replies due by 10/30/2013. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/30/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Granting 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court shall forthwith enter judgment in favor of Defendants Brian Henry, an individual, and Hatched Development, Inc. and against Plaintiff Craig M. Miller. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/8/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Denying 5 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/15/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
