Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Nevada District Court The Seasons Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Richmond American Homes of Nevada, Inc.

The Seasons Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Richmond American Homes of Nevada, Inc.

Plaintiff:	The Seasons Homeowners Association, Inc.
Defendant:	Richmond American Homes of Nevada, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2011cv01875
Filed:	November 21, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge:	Kent J. Dawson
Presiding Judge:	Peggy A. Leen
Nature of Suit:	Prop. Damage Prod. Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By:	None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 31, 2012	Filing 59 ORDER that Third-Party Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Companys request to substitute LeAnn Sanders in the place and stead of Tomas V. Marzeika is GRANTED, subject to the provisions of LR IA 10-6(c) and (d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
July 19, 2012	Filing 57 ORDER that Richmonds Motion to Compel Arbitration 25 is GRANTED to the extent the original homeowner members shall be compelled to arbitrate the claims asserted in this action. Richmonds Motion to Compel Arbitration 25 is DENIED to the extent it seeks an order of the court requiring individual arbitrations. This action is STAYED as to the original homeowner members pending arbitration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/19/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 31, 2012

Filing 59 ORDER that Third-Party Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Companys request to substitute LeAnn Sanders in the place and stead of Tomas V. Marzeika is GRANTED, subject to the provisions of LR IA 10-6(c) and (d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

July 19, 2012

Filing 57 ORDER that Richmonds Motion to Compel Arbitration 25 is GRANTED to the extent the original homeowner members shall be compelled to arbitrate the claims asserted in this action. Richmonds Motion to Compel Arbitration 25 is DENIED to the extent it seeks an order of the court requiring individual arbitrations. This action is STAYED as to the original homeowner members pending arbitration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/19/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Seasons Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Richmond American Homes of Nevada, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Richmond American Homes of Nevada, Inc.
Represented By:	Raymond Babaian
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Seasons Homeowners Association, Inc.
Represented By:	Scott K. Canepa
Represented By:	James D. Carraway
Represented By:	J. Randall Jones
Represented By:	Francis I Lynch
Represented By:	Robert C. Maddox
Represented By:	Terry W. Riedy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?