BMW of North America, LLC v. Kortek Services, Inc. et al
BMW of North America, LLC |
Kortek Services, Inc. and Lyle Andrew Epstein |
BMW of North America, LLC |
Lyle Andrew Epstein and Kortek Services, Inc. |
2:2011cv01909 |
November 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Larry R. Hicks |
Peggy A. Leen |
Other Statutory Actions |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of BMW of North America, LLC and against Kortek Services, Inc. and Lyle Andrew Epstein in the amount of $150,000.00. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/11/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 40 ORDER Granting 36 Motion to Compel to the extent that Plaintiff shall have until October 1, 2012, to supplement its Answer to Interrogatory No. 21 consistent with the body of this order. Any request for relief not specifically addressed in this order is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/17/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 22 ORDER Granting 11 Motion to Dismiss Defendants counterclaim for abuse of process. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/28/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 21 ORDER Accepting 19 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/7/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.