Boyd v. Nevens et al
| Gregory D. Boyd |
| Dwight Nevens and Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
| 2:2011cv01916 |
| November 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| James C. Mahan |
| George Foley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER Granting 13 Motion to Dismiss. The Amended Petition 9 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS UNTIMELY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability is warranted and none shall issue. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/13/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Granting 24 Respondents' Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery and Granting 23 Respondents' Motion to Extend Time to File a Reply to 13 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents will have two wee ks to conduct discovery relevant to their Reply brief. Respondents must file their Reply Brief ten (10) days after the close of the relevant discovery. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/05/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Setting Schedule for Proceedings. Amended Petition due by 4/18/2012. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/19/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
