24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al v. Reese
| 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America |
| Wesley Reese |
| 2:2011cv01947 |
| December 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Philip M. Pro |
| George Foley |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 19 Stipulation of Dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 03/26/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER that the hearing set for 9/17/12 at 10:00 a.m. in LV Courtroom 7C before Judge Philip M. Pro is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is STAYED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all outstanding motions are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court administratively close these cases until a party files a motion to lift the stay. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/21/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER that a Hearing is set for 9/17/2012 10:00 AM in LV Courtroom 7C before Judge Philip M. Pro on the following: 1 Petition to Compel Arbitration, 14 Motion to Strike Answer to Complaint, and 16 Notice. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/20/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
