Marrocco v. Hill et al
Plaintiff: Dominic Anthony Marrocco
Defendant: Mark A Hill and Marcellous McZeal
Case Number: 2:2012cv00028
Filed: January 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Johnston
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER Granting 81 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as to both defendants for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/13/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
October 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER Granting 95 Motion to Continue District Judge Hearing. Calendar Call set for 11/13/2013 01:30 PM in LV Courtroom 6A before Judge James C. Mahan. Jury Trial set for 11/18/2013 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6A before Judge James C. Mahan Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/16/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
July 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER GRANTING in part Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees incurred in bring his counter-motion to compel re 49 Affidavit; and GRANTING 61 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs. Defendants shall make a payment of $10,210 to Plaintiff no later than July 30, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/22/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
May 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER that 51 Objections to Magistrate Judge Koppe's Order are OVERRULED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/15/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
January 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER Granting 35 Countermotion to Compel Discovery. FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants must provide a proper privilege log and properly respond to the Plaintiff's Requests for Production, Interrogatories, and Requests for Admission within s even (7) days of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' request for costs and fees associated with bringing the Countermotion to Compel 35 is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for the Plaintiff to submit an affidavit of costs and fees is January 31, 2013, and the Defendants' Responses are due by February 7, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/24/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
July 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 39 Amended Stipulation to Stay, Continue Hearing and to File a Joint Status Report. FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Stipulation to Stay, Continue Hearing and to File Joint Status Report is GRANTED in tha t this case is STAYED until August 6, 2012. FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing scheduled for July 17, 2012, is VACATED. FURTHER ORDERED that said hearing is rescheduled to August 9, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in LV Courtroom 3D, 3d floor, Lloyd D. George Unite d States Courthouse. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall promptly notify the court if this action is settled through mediation prior to August 6, 2012. FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Stipulation to Stay, Continue Hearing and to File a Joint Status Report 39 is DENIED as to all other requests. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 7/17/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
May 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 16 Motion to Dismiss. The second and third claims in plaintiff's first amended complaint are dismissed. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/24/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
March 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Expunging Defendant's Notice of Lis Pendens. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/16/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
February 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Denying without prejudice 10 Motion to Dismiss. FURTHER ORDERED that 4 Motion for Order to Show Cause is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall file a brief with the court on or before 3/9/12 demonstrating why notice of lis pendens should not be expunged. Plaintiff may respond within 14 day and defendants may file a reply within 7 days. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/28/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marrocco v. Hill et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark A Hill
Represented By: Robert A. Nersesian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marcellous McZeal
Represented By: Robert A. Nersesian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dominic Anthony Marrocco
Represented By: Charles H McCrea, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?