Lee v. Trump et al
Plaintiff: Robin M Lee
Defendant: Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
Case Number: 2:2012cv00077
Filed: January 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER Granting 32 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of the Court is ordered to close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/25/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
July 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Denying 29 Plaintiff Robin M. Lee's Motion Requesting All of the Below. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/2/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
June 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER Denying without prejudice 22 Robin M. Lee's Motion for an Immediate Court Order of Partial Settlement. Plaintiff may renew this motion after defendants have been properly served with a summons and a copy of the complaint and after plaintiff has filed proof of service with the court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(a), (c)(1), and (l)(1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/12/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
May 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Denying without prejudice 9 Motion that all proceedings be in publications, Denying without prejudice 13 Motion Filed that the Following Orders Prepared be Granted to Inc. a Minimum $10 Billion Default Judgment for the Plaintiff, and Denying without prejudice 14 Motion for Emergency Situation Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/23/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
April 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DENYING without prejudice 5 Plaintiff's Motion for Documentation and Publication and 8 Motion for Default Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall re-issue 3 Summons and mail to Plaintiff as to Trump Corporation and Don ald J. Trump. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have 120 days from the date summons are issued to serve Plaintiff's Complaint on Defendants in full compliance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/23/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Trump et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trump Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald J. Trump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin M Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?