Morton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
| Lourdes Maria Morton |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Claims Management, Inc. |
| 2:2012cv00155 |
| January 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| Robert C. Jones |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER Granting 38 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Denying Plaintiff's 48 Motion for Sanctions. The Clerk is instructed to close the case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/27/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Denying 37 Motion to Stay. Denying 39 Motion for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.s Bad Faith Conduct During Discovery. Denying 42 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/11/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Clerks Default. The parties' 3/13/2012 Stipulated Dismissal is hereby WITHDRAWN. Defendants Claims Management, Inc. and Arkansas Claims Management, Inc. have 21 days from the entry of this Order to respond to Morton's Complaint. Defendant's 19 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Wal-Mart's 29 Second Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/12/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
